The Dim-Post

June 25, 2008

Very Serious Thoughts: US and NZ Politics

Filed under: Politics — danylmc @ 5:15 pm

As others have commented the Prime Minister seems to be in a state of genuine denial over her parties position in the polls; it seems incredible that a politician as experienced and formidible as Clark is going to lose (and lose massively) to John Key and National, a barely competent party with no policies and no direction with a mediocre underperforming leader with no government experience.

It’s almost as strange as the situation in the US, in which its becoming more apparant that John McCain, a popular, well liked war hero with decades of experience is going to lose (possibly badly) to a relative novice with no military background and the last name of Obama.

The media narrative in both countries is that people want ‘change for change’s sake’. I think this is patronising. People do want change but what they want to change is their goverments, which are bad, for another one that they hope will be good.

If Mr Obama is victorious then he will owe his place in history to the Bush Administration, which has not so much governed badly but failed to govern at all. On the contrary, New Zealand suffers from a surfeit of over-government and leaders for whom the solution to every problem is more (taxpayers) money, more regulation, more civil-servants and still more money.

Not only will Clark lead her party to a humiliating defeat, I suspect she has damaged its brand for the forseeable future. Just as National’s catastrophic failures of the 90′s still harm the party today, a competant National government will be able to enjoy at least ten years in power by darkly warning that a vote for Labour will plunge us back into the ‘nightmare of a Clark-like nanny state’. Of course, we are unlikely to enjoy a competant National government, even for three years but the opportunity for long term hegemony is there for Mr Key if he can seize it. Clark has given him that much.

About these ads

5 Comments »

  1. A very considered, well balanced and observant post.

    Comment by J Mex — June 25, 2008 @ 7:55 pm

  2. Jesus – I read this political analysis and found nothing to bitch about. I feel strangely empty…

    Comment by Psycho Milt — June 25, 2008 @ 8:26 pm

  3. Funny, I was making this very same comparison just today on another forum. True too, that both leaders are effectively offering nothing apart from not being the incumbent. At least Key is surrounded by people with political experience (albeit some of whom will be forever tainted by association with the Shipley regime), but Obama could be a complete disaster in the white House. Interesting times ahead, I think.

    Comment by Don — June 26, 2008 @ 3:27 pm

  4. I agree with everything you’re saying, apart from the idea that any of this is surprising.

    Comment by gazzaj — June 26, 2008 @ 6:50 pm

  5. Nice piece except the end bit where it all becomes a bit emotive – hegemony of incompetent doom warners – come on…

    Comment by expat — July 1, 2008 @ 2:20 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 336 other followers

%d bloggers like this: