The Dim-Post

August 24, 2009

Chart o’ the day, just sayin’ edition

Filed under: crime — danylmc @ 6:15 am

assault

About these ads

8 Comments »

  1. It’s because they’re all heathens. If they were good Christian folk, they’d know the difference between hitting women and children.

    Comment by Mark — August 24, 2009 @ 9:11 am

  2. @Mark These people are married to children, there is no difference.

    Comment by John — August 24, 2009 @ 9:38 am

  3. yikes.

    such a large variation, wonder what that’s about.

    did you spot this one –

    http://www.childinfo.org/discipline_countrydata.php

    I suppose the emphasis on developing countries by UNICEF is understandable but it would be handy to be able to compare with the rest.

    Comment by Neil — August 24, 2009 @ 10:08 am

  4. From Mayhew’s London Labour and the London Poor, an actual 1840s Punch and Judy man:

    “Otheller murders his wife, ye know, like Punch does. Otheller kills her, ’cause the green-eyed monster has got into his ‘art, and he being so extremely fond on her; but Punch kills his’n by accident, though he did not intend to do it, for the Act of Parliament against husbands beating wives was not known in his time. A most excellent law that there, for it causes husbands and wives to be kind and natural one with the other, all through the society of life.”

    http://dl.tufts.edu/view_text.jsp?urn=tufts:central:dca:UA069:UA069.005.DO.00079&chapter=c2s1

    Comment by lyndon — August 24, 2009 @ 10:13 am

  5. For a little context…

    “What they were asked, in the MICS and the DHS (the two primary sources for the data), was this question:

    “Sometimes a husband is annoyed or angered by things that his wife does. In your opinion, is a husband justified in hitting or beating his wife in the following situations:
    – If she goes out with out telling him?
    – If she neglects the children?
    – If she argues with him?
    – If she refuses sex with him?
    – If she burns the food?”

    Comment by georgedarroch — August 24, 2009 @ 6:44 pm

  6. double yikes

    Comment by Neil — August 24, 2009 @ 7:05 pm

  7. And what would a similar survey about hitting children look like?

    Would NZ stand out like the DBs or what?

    Comment by Don — August 24, 2009 @ 10:01 pm

  8. Eighty eight percent Don, eighty eight percent.

    New Zealand, fighting the good fight for the right to hit kids.

    Comment by georgedarroch — August 24, 2009 @ 10:08 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

The Rubric Theme. Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 400 other followers

%d bloggers like this: