The Dim-Post

January 14, 2010

Religion. Childrens books. Lubricant. Hedgehogs. Thatcher.

Filed under: art — danylmc @ 6:51 am

Here’s fun. You probably didn’t know that you can buy communion wafers on Amazon. And of course Amazon tells you what else frequent buyers of each product purchased:

I guess it could be a set up. The comments are pretty funny:

Somehow the manufacturer has managed to get rid of that disturbing bloody aftertaste that plagues most brands of Jesus’ raw flesh. Maybe they somehow siphon off the Jesus blood to use it in making tasty, iron-rich, blood of Jesus-flavored wine.

For those people who suffer from celiac disease, and therefore are unable to tolerate wheat, we wonder if this tasty Jesus-flavored snack would still trigger the destructive autoimmune reaction that typifies celiac disease.

Over the summer break I finally got around to reading the first book in Phillip Pullman’s His Dark Materials trilogy; it’s pretty strange – a childrens (or rather young adult) book about the Catholic Church and child abuse. It’s obviously written as a secular, humanist response to C S Lewis and his Narnia books, and it seems to me that all the crazy accusations leveled agains the Harry Potter books (pagan brainwashing, etc) are actually kind of accurate if you shine them on His Dark Materials. Pullman’s a very good writer, but not quite good enough to pull off the trick of seamlessly combining his propaganda and his art. It’ll be interesting to see if the books stand the test of time.

I also read John Connelly’s Book of Lost Things, which I highly recommend, although it is very dark. I’m not sure if it’s a childrens book or a book about childhood. To prove to myself that I’m still a grown up I sat down last night with Phillip Larkin. I read Aubade:

This is a special way of being afraid
No trick dispels. Religion used to try,
That vast moth-eaten musical brocade
Created to pretend we never die

That line – vast moth-eaten . . . -drifts through my mind whenever I enter a church and I’ve always wondered where it came from but never got around to googling it, so it’s nice to scratch that itch. I think Aubade is his finest work, although I’m also fond of The Mower:

The mower stalled, twice; kneeling, I found
A hedgehog jammed up against the blades,
Killed. It had been in the long grass.

I had seen it before, and even fed it, once.
Now I had mauled its unobtrusive world
Unmendably. Burial was no help:

Next morning I got up and it did not.
The first day after a death, the new absence
Is always the same; we should be careful

Of each other, we should be kind
While there is still time.

Amazingly Thatcher wanted to make him Poet Laureate (in return Larkin liked her personally but felt politically that she was too left wing).

9 Comments »

  1. I went scurrying back to Larkin after summer reading as well – in my case, after reading ‘One Day’ by David Nicholls. It opens with Larkin’s “Days” –

    What are days for?
    Days are where we live.
    They come, they wake us
    Time and time over.
    They are to be happy in:
    Where can we live but days?

    Ah, solving that question
    Brings the priest and the doctor
    In their long coats
    Running over the fields.

    Always loved that final image.

    Not sure that Larkin turned the laureateship down for quite the reasons you suggest…from memory he was fairly ill by the time Betjeman died and only lived another year or two. He’d dreaded the role, in any case – there is a hilarious part of Kingsley Amis’s memoirs when he asks Larkin about his prospects and Larkin says lugubriously ‘I’m not going to be able to avoid that bugger’ or something similar.

    Comment by Rob Hosking — January 14, 2010 @ 7:36 am

  2. I heard an anecdote (I can’t remember where) of someone who had to drive Larkin and Amis to some literary event, and was thrilled at the prospect of spending hours in the company of such luminaries. The two men spent the entire ride debating whose underwear they would least like to wear on their head.

    Comment by danylmc — January 14, 2010 @ 7:43 am

  3. If you think that the first book in His Dark Materials is a bit too heavy on the propaganda, you’re going to love the third. Pullman basically gives up on telling a story in exchange for a full-on frothing at the mouth rant against Christianity, religion, and the Roman Catholic Church.

    Comment by Thomas Beagle — January 14, 2010 @ 8:07 am

  4. Book three of His Dark Materials also has the best character, who buggers off early and returns at the end only for a moment. But Pullman’s use of characters throughout the series is ‘interesting’, as nearly all of them are thoroughly unlikeable.

    He has some great ideas though, such as the daemons and the shape of the ultimate war. And the skewering of any highly-authoritarian church is never a bad idea.

    Comment by Ataahua — January 14, 2010 @ 8:31 am

  5. Lubricant, hedgehogs, Thatcher – unfortunately that conjures up images, none of which are pleasant.

    Comment by Psycho Milt — January 14, 2010 @ 8:42 am

  6. Now that would be an alarming bustle in your hedgerow.

    Comment by Sam Finnemore — January 14, 2010 @ 8:55 am

  7. Not sure that Larkin turned the laureateship down for quite the reasons you suggest…from memory he was fairly ill by the time Betjeman died and only lived another year or two. He’d dreaded the role, in any case – there is a hilarious part of Kingsley Amis’s memoirs when he asks Larkin about his prospects and Larkin says lugubriously ‘I’m not going to be able to avoid that bugger’ or something similar.

    Well, no there’s actually a bit more to the story. That section on Larkin in Amis’ Memoirs is a re-hash of the piece he wrote for Larkin at Sixty (well worth tracking down for wonderful contributions by Alan Bennett, Clive James and others). Larkin asked him to cut that anecdote, because (frankly) it makes him look like an utter ego-maniac. Amis, being the utter shit that he was, put it back in as soon as Larkin was no longer around to object.

    It wasn’t Larkin’s health that was the issue — the one small mercy was that the cancer that killed him didn’t fuck around — but that he’d only published half a dozen poems since High Windows came out a decade earlier. And with the striking exception of ‘Aubade’, they weren’t up to his usual standard. By the middle of 1984, he’d stopped writing poetry entirely and never expected to start again.

    Comment by Craig Ranapia — January 14, 2010 @ 10:08 am

  8. I’ve just read the trilogy again. It was better second time round and the second book is the best.

    One of my favourite jokes is: They’ve just invented a new low fat communion wafer. It’s called “I can’t believe it’s not Jesus”.

    Comment by insider — January 14, 2010 @ 10:11 pm

  9. Talking of books, some of those titles on the actual “also bought” column look hilarious.

    “Jesus Wants to Save Christians; a Manifesto for the Church in Exile”

    “Wild Goosechase- reclaiming the Adventure of Pursuing God”

    And my favourite-

    “Crazy Love; Overwhelmed by a Relentless God”- “Jehovah swept Sister Margaret off her feet, his insistent glory probing her burning bush…”

    Comment by pudney — January 16, 2010 @ 11:23 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 108 other followers