I keep looking for the beginning of the flow chart. I suspect that like objectivism the chart starts with self evident truth, so I just can’t see it cause I am a stupid commie, oh and rape!
Comment by andy (the other one) — February 18, 2010 @ 9:00 am
Attribution is for losers. When it says “make” speech it really means boldly steal and mash together other people’s. Hamburger outsourced to avoid similar temptation in kitchen – for Atlas can not live by leftovers alone.
I keep looking for the beginning of the flow chart. I suspect that like objectivism the chart starts with self evident truth, so I just can’t see it cause I am a stupid commie, oh and rape!
Comment by andy (the other one) — February 18, 2010 @ 9:00 am
Ick, but apt.
Comment by Sam — February 18, 2010 @ 9:25 am
Attribution?
Comment by Berend de Boer — February 18, 2010 @ 9:31 am
Shouldn’t that be “Make boring, incomprehensible, illogical speech that lasts 60 pages”?
Comment by Bill Bennett — February 18, 2010 @ 9:51 am
Probably a stupid commie, Berend.
Comment by Eddie C — February 18, 2010 @ 9:51 am
I am suddenly struck by the desire to make a similar chart for Robert Heinlein.
Comment by Repton — February 18, 2010 @ 9:58 am
Would you wear bells on your shoes?
No.
Stupid commie.
Comment by joew — February 18, 2010 @ 10:34 am
Attribution is for losers. When it says “make” speech it really means boldly steal and mash together other people’s. Hamburger outsourced to avoid similar temptation in kitchen – for Atlas can not live by leftovers alone.
Comment by Sacha — February 18, 2010 @ 10:44 am
yes! this is what new zealand needs! more resourceful, powerful, angular men to rape hamburgers across the nation!
Comment by Che Tibby — February 18, 2010 @ 12:21 pm