The Dim-Post

April 1, 2010

Question time in the House of Lords. Seriously

Filed under: general news — danylmc @ 2:44 pm

March 3, 2010

Palace of Westminster: Pest Control Question

3.07 pm

Asked By Baroness Finlay of Llandaff

    To ask the Chairman of Committees what measures are being considered to improve pest control in the Lords’ part of the Palace of Westminster.

The Chairman of Committees (Lord Brabazon of Tara): My Lords, the administration is fully aware of the problem with mice in the Palace of Westminster and is taking all appropriate measures to minimise their numbers. We retain the services of an independent pest control consultant and a full-time pest controller. The current focus is on poisoning and trapping, blocking of mouse access points, and more frequent cleaning of bars and restaurants to remove food debris. This programme was intensified over the February Recess and fewer sightings of mice have been reported since.

Baroness Finlay of Llandaff: I thank the noble Lord for his reply. How many calls have there been to the mouse helpline? Has the accuracy of that information been checked, given that the staff report seeing mice on a daily basis at the moment in the eating areas? Has consideration been given to having hypoallergenic cats on the estate, given the history? Miss Wilson, when she was a resident superintendent in this Palace, had a cat that apparently caught up to 60 mice a night. The corpses were then swept up in the morning. Finally, does the noble Lord recognise the fire hazard that mice pose, because they eat through insulating cables? It would be a tragedy for this beautiful Palace to burn down for lack of a cat.

The Chairman of Committees: My Lords, there are a number of questions there. I cannot give an answer to the number of calls made to the mouse helpline-if that is its title. I suspect that it would not be a good use of resources to count them up. But I am well aware of the problem of mice, as I said in my Answer. It is something that we take seriously.

As for getting a cat, I answered a Question from the noble Lord, Lord Elton, last week on this matter. I was not aware that such a thing as a hypoallergenic cat existed-I do not know whether our cat at home is one of those. There are a number of reasons why it is not a good idea to have cats. First, they would ingest mouse poison when eating poisoned mice, which would not be very nice for them, and there would be nothing to keep them where they are needed or stop them walking around the House on desks in offices or on tables in restaurants and bars-and maybe even in the Chamber itself. Therefore, we have ruled out at this stage the possibility of acquiring a cat, or cats.

Lord Bradshaw: I have spoken continually to the staff in the eating places in the House and I acknowledge that there has been some diminution in the number of mice around. But could I press the noble Lord, because further action needs to be taken? I know that this is an old building, but mice are still here and we are talking about places where food is served. I have no magic solution, but perhaps the consultant who is being employed might have some answers.

The Chairman of Committees: My Lords, I am well aware that there are still mice around. I saw one in the Bishops’ Bar only yesterday evening. I do not know whether it was the same one that I saw the day before or a different one; it is always difficult to tell the difference between the various mice that one sees. We believe that the problem is getting better. Cleaning is one of the measures we are taking, as I outlined in my original Answer. As I speak here this afternoon, the Bishops’ Bar and the Guest Room are being hoovered, so we can get rid of the food scraps from lunch. If you were a mouse, you would rather eat the crumbs of a smoked salmon sandwich than the bait. Therefore, we want to remove the crumbs as quickly as possible.

Lord Pilkington of Oxenford: Why should I and noble Lords trust the Executive to deal with mice when they cannot deal with the economy?

The Chairman of Committees: My Lords, I do not actually deal with the economy. I am glad to say that that would be above my pay grade, whereas trying to deal with the mice is probably just about right for me.

Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean: My Lords, I was in total ignorance that there was anything of the nature of a mouse helpline until this Question Time. Can the Chairman of Committees tell us what helplines there are for Members of the House on other issues that we do not know about?

The Chairman of Committees: I rather hope that we do not have too many other ones. I was not going to advertise the existence of the mouse helpline, although it was advertised some time ago. Indeed, I invited Members of the House to telephone when they saw mice. The trouble is that when the person at the other end of the helpline goes to check this out, very often the mouse has gone elsewhere.

The link to the Lord’s Hansard is here if you don’t believe me.

19 Comments »

  1. Perfect.

    Comment by Sally — April 1, 2010 @ 3:21 pm

  2. My Lords, I seek leave to table a hypoallergenic cat, and the crumbs of a smoked salmon sandwich…

    Comment by Pat — April 1, 2010 @ 3:27 pm

  3. The link to the Lord’s Hansard is here if you don’t believe me.

    I’m pretty sure I believe you. I don’t think that’s something any satirist could actually write that (no offence intended :-)

    It’s just too understated and gloriously bland (while witty) not to be real.

    Comment by Graeme Edgeler — April 1, 2010 @ 3:31 pm

  4. What would Trevor Mallard say…

    “Point of Order, Mr Speaker, I want to object to the insinuation that the current mouse problem existed during the period of the previous government, in which I was a Minister of Sport which may or may not have included blood-sports such as mice hunting. At no time during that 9 years did I personally see a mouse and I spent many long nights dropping crumbs and spilling beer in the Bar area, nor does the current government have any evidence that the current mice are the same mice that existed under the previous government, if in fact they can live that long.”

    Comment by Pat — April 1, 2010 @ 3:42 pm

  5. Mr Key would be relaxed about the mouse problem, and Gerry Brownlee estimates there is $40bn worth of mouse droppings to be harvested.

    Comment by andy (the other one) — April 1, 2010 @ 4:01 pm

  6. So Lord Brabazon of Tara is responsible for mice. He presumably got this job because his father (?) the first Lord B of T, was largely responsible for this rather splendid aircraft. It was a bit bigger than a 747 but seated only 25 passengers, based on the concept that an air traveller would require about the same space as a family car.

    Heroic really.

    Comment by Rich — April 1, 2010 @ 4:21 pm

  7. …it is always difficult to tell the difference between the various mice that one sees.

    They all look the same to you, eh? Speciesist bastards!

    Comment by Psycho Milt — April 1, 2010 @ 4:24 pm

  8. This is why we need a second chamber in our Parliament. Having just one simply isn’t sufficient to produce this level of comedy gold.

    Comment by Andrew Geddis — April 1, 2010 @ 4:36 pm

  9. I would suggest that our MPs be forced to take ‘Lord x of y’ names upon entering parliament, but our place names aren’t ridiculous enough for it to work.

    Comment by Helen — April 1, 2010 @ 5:09 pm

  10. What they need is assistance from Lord Sandy of Rankine.

    L

    Comment by Lew — April 1, 2010 @ 5:16 pm

  11. You’re kidding me, right?

    No, not that you think this is extraordinary, but that this is the best you could find.

    Lords Hansard, 22nd January 2002

    The Chairman of Committees (Lord Tordoff): My Lords, as far as I am aware, the arrangements were quite satisfactory. I have had no complaints about the Christmas cards that I sent out, although, I regret to say, I did not send one to the noble Lord. If the noble Lord can indicate what the particular problem is, we could deal with it. If I cannot, the works of art panel could.

    Lord St John of Fawsley: My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for his Answer. Does he realise that, like Bognor, he is the last resort? Does he know that I addressed myself to the Printed Paper Office and was told that the matter was nothing to do with that office? I was told to go to the Attendants Office. On arrival at the Attendants Office, I was told that it had nothing to do with them and that I should go to the Printed Paper Office. So I have come to the noble Lord.

    The noble Lord is very satisfied with the card. May I ask him whether he realises that the principal card—which follows the barbarous custom of standing on its side—did not and does not? It fell down. Having fallen down, it refused to get up. The envelopes were far too small for the cards. Does he realise that? The effect was that, when the cards were put in, the envelopes burst. Does he realise that the glue had long ago lost whatever adhesive quality it might have had? My unfortunate secretary had to go and buy, at her own expense, a glue stick to stick them down.

    Finally, would the noble Lord advert to the fact that, although the exterior of the card contained a beautiful picture of Westminster Abbey, the interior described it as Westminster Cathedral? That must be the anachronism of the millennium. All one can say to that is, “Pas encore” and to the noble Lord, “Where will it all end?”.

    The Chairman of Committees: My Lords, I am reminded of the alleged last words of His Majesty King George V in relation to Bognor.

    As for the size of the envelopes, I managed to get the cards into the envelope without too much difficulty. Perhaps I have slimmer fingers than the noble Lord. My spit must be more adhesive than the noble Lord’s. The reference to Westminster Cathedral was unfortunate. As the noble Lord suggested, Westminster Cathedral had not been built at the time the picture was painted.

    It was, I understand, a translation from the French, but it was somewhat mistranslated. “Eglise”, which was in the original title, was mistranslated as “cathedral” instead of “church”. However, neither is correct because it is an abbey.

    As to where the noble Lord should go with his problems, complaints about such matters should perhaps be addressed to the chairman of the Advisory Panel on Works of Art which decides which card shall be produced. I understand that there is a meeting in March. If the noble Lord wishes to address his problems to it, I am sure that the panel will take them up.

    Baroness Hilton of Eggardon: My Lords, I should like to apologise to the House for the mistake over Westminster Cathedral, which provided a lot of innocent amusement to many Members of the House before Christmas. Is the noble Lord aware that this time we received more congratulations on the cards we had chosen than in any previous year in which I have been involved in selecting Christmas cards with the assistance of my panel?

    The Chairman of Committees: My Lords, I am glad about that. The panel is to be congratulated on the fact that as a result of the increase in price more than £1,300 was donated to the Save the Children Fund and more than £800 was donated to the House of Lords fund for the advancing of public understanding of Parliament through the acquisition of works of art. I believe that the Advisory Panel on Works of Art does a rather good job.

    Baroness Trumpington: My Lords, is the noble Lord aware that as a member of the panel I want to pay tribute to its chairman, the noble Baroness, Lady Hilton, for her extremely hard work and leadership in connection with all its work? Does he agree that perhaps those who criticise might consider putting their names forward to join the panel, which year after year takes infinite trouble when undertaking the extremely difficult job of choosing a Christmas card which, it hopes, will please the majority of your Lordships?

    The Chairman of Committees: My Lords, I am sure that the noble Baroness, Lady Hilton, will be extremely grateful for that comment, coming as it does from someone who has spent much of her time as a member of the works of art panel. There is no doubt that as one walks around the House and looks at the pictures on the walls one can see that a very good job has been done in recent years. There is now more variety. Furthermore, there is not just one Christmas card; there are, at most, four. There is a range of cards from which people can choose, most of which, I believe, fit into the envelopes.

    Comment by dontsurf — April 1, 2010 @ 6:04 pm

  12. Helen wrote: “I would suggest that our MPs be forced to take ‘Lord x of y’ names upon entering parliament, but our place names aren’t ridiculous enough for it to work.”

    Not amusing to us, maybe, but I assure you many foreigners are puzzled by the blandness of Greytown, and the grossness of Greymouth and Gore. They titter (lovely word, that) at Waipu and Whakatane. Dunedin suburbs are good, particularly Tomahawk, Caversham and Woodhaugh. Our place names are more than silly enough.

    I hereby declare myself Lady Kahikatea of Pigroot.

    Comment by kahikatea — April 1, 2010 @ 8:00 pm

  13. I used to live in Gropers Bush…

    Comment by Andrew W — April 2, 2010 @ 7:53 am

  14. The corpses were then swept up in the morning.

    Any ideas how many times this phrase appears in their Hansard? Thx rs.

    Comment by mjl — April 2, 2010 @ 8:16 am

  15. Lord Mallard of Wainui-O-Mata has a certain hollow thud to it.

    Lady Bennett of The West sounds like a bogun Galadriel nes pas?

    Comment by organgrinder — April 2, 2010 @ 9:35 am

  16. @3 “I don’t think that’s something any satirist could actually write that”

    I think Terry Pratchett could, and possibly did. But I know what you mean.

    Comment by Roger Parkinson — April 2, 2010 @ 2:18 pm

  17. [...] Dim-Post dug this up, and it is real, not satire: March 3, [...]

    Pingback by The House of Lords | Kiwiblog — April 2, 2010 @ 3:02 pm

  18. i have never been in favour of (whatever) “upper house”.

    Given the above I can foresee a rich vein of humour.

    Perhaps we should have an “upper house”.

    Our satirists are completely undone by the idiots in the “lower house”.

    Bring on the upper house.

    Our satirists are worth preserving!

    Comment by peterlepaysan — April 2, 2010 @ 8:03 pm

  19. [...] Question time in the House of Lords. Seriously – Dim Post finds real Hanard transcripts imitating satire. He’s also had a horrible thought prompted by the end of daylight saving. [...]

    Pingback by Did you see the one about . . . « Homepaddock — April 5, 2010 @ 6:32 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Theme: Rubric. Blog at WordPress.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 108 other followers