The government’s response to the Law Commission report on alcohol was released yesterday. What are some of the proposed changes?
- Raising purchase age from off-licenses to 20, amending additional legislation to raise voting age, marriage age and driving age to 20 too. You like that, you smart-ass little punks?
- Reprint existing but unenforced laws regulating liquor industry in bold font.
- Anti-Perfect Day ordinance allows local councils to prevent consumption of sangria in the park.
- Tougher penalties for shaking up a can of beer and then handing it to someone else to open.
- Sunset provision suspending all present and future alcohol regulations within a 1.5 kilometre radius of the Minister for Sports and Foreign Affairs.
- Parents permitting other people’s children to do tequila laybacks in their home must provide iodised salt and a minimum of one lime/child aged over eight.
- Decision on minimum pricing to be deferred until alcohol research group reports back on the best recipe for jelly vodkas.
- Fine for playing LCD Soundsystem’s Drunk Girls after midnight in a residential area increased to $20,000 per offence.
- Lower blood alcohol limit while driving to zero for under-twenties, DPB recipients and trades union members.
- Writing ‘I Like Samoans’ in lipstick on Bill English’s head while he’s passed out and then dropping him off in Porirua at 4 AM to find his own way home to become punishable by death.
- Document of Intent to be circulated to Doug Sellman and other anti-alcohol campaigners explaining that New Zealand does not have a drinking problem, it can stop any time it wants. And screw them man, what business is of of theirs how much we drink anyway? What are they spying on us or something? It’s not us with the problem – it’s them.
- Current advertising code and promotion guidelines to remain: Lion-Nathan and DB Breweries will continue to be name brand sponsors of the Sale of Liquor Act.
Writing ‘I Like Samoans’ in lipstick on Bill English’s head while he’s passed out and then dropping him off in Porirua at 4 AM to find his own way home to become punishable by death.
But he said he liked that!
Comment by Ataahua — August 24, 2010 @ 8:18 am
You missed one Danyl – The government is going to make it compulsory for TV news to play footage of young people drunk in public every time alcohol laws are discussed.
Comment by ieuan — August 24, 2010 @ 8:41 am
Th’ Dudes man, th dudes!
Anti Perfect Day ordinance -huh! pharkin hilarious
Comment by Cnr Joe — August 24, 2010 @ 8:51 am
The government is going to make it compulsory for TV news to play footage of young people drunk in public every time alcohol laws are discussed.
That’s part of the nationwide drinking game: ‘Drunk youth on TV news: Take one shot.’
Comment by Ataahua — August 24, 2010 @ 9:15 am
I want to know just how the printer business got the bold font requirement put in – talk about pork-barrel politics!
Comment by Michael Stevens — August 24, 2010 @ 9:28 am
LLLLLoooolll. Vintage.
Comment by Vibenna — August 24, 2010 @ 9:37 am
“Anti-Perfect Day ordinance allows local councils to prevent consumption of sangria in the park.”
Don’t you mean banning the consumption of dubonnet on ice?
Comment by Andrew Geddis — August 24, 2010 @ 10:08 am
Genius. Thanks Danyl.
* ‘We’re just tired and emotional’ instated as new country slogan.
* Free shots provided to every World Cup visitor.
* Any MP pointing during parliamentary debates will have to do so using their elbow. Otherwise, scull.
* Additional funding for hard-hitting drink-driving campaigns showing the hard-hitting dangers of drink driving in a manner that really hits home.
* Construction of new Shawshank Prison roof to be accompanied by a crate of suds at the end of the project for workers.
Comment by McRad — August 24, 2010 @ 10:20 am
Anti-Perfect Day ordinance allows local councils to prevent consumption of sangria in the park
Yes, we all thought we were someone else. Someone good.
So we must ALL pay!
Comment by Neil — August 24, 2010 @ 11:21 am
One drink penalty to McRad for using the dreaded ‘s’ word – house rules ban it. And make sure the penalty consumption is with the left hand only.
Comment by insider — August 24, 2010 @ 12:31 pm
Fair enough. Got a few odd looks at work. Whose up next?
Comment by McRad — August 24, 2010 @ 12:51 pm
Dear Danyl
We’re not anti-alcohol. That would be just about as ridiculous as being anti-water. We’re also not wanting to tell anyone how much they should or should not drink and feel strongly that neither the government nor ALAC should either. I’m sorry you’ve got that impression. We’re simply into putting into the public domain the best scientific information we can access about alcohol and alcohol policy that helps get the simple pleasures of life from our favourite recreational drug while avoiding the enormous damage and expensive cleanup that is currently happening.
Cheers
Doug Sellman
Medical Spokesperson – Alcohol Action NZ
ps the alcohol industry has a lot to answer for…
Comment by Doug Sellman — August 24, 2010 @ 3:00 pm
Hi Doug, the article was firmly tongue in cheek, a pity you missed it. Then again, you know what they say about wowsers….
Comment by George D — August 24, 2010 @ 3:56 pm
@George Darroch, of course the article as a whole is tongue-in-cheek, but Professor Sel;lman was responding specifically to the description of his group as anti-alcohol, and it’s not clear that that phrase in particular was tongue-in-cheek.
Comment by kahikatea — August 24, 2010 @ 4:39 pm
Kahikatea, it seemed pretty clear that section was satirising people unable to admit their drinking problem – ie New Zealand.
Comment by George D — August 24, 2010 @ 4:45 pm
We’re also not wanting to tell anyone how much they should or should not drink and feel strongly that neither the government nor ALAC should either. I’m sorry you’ve got that impression.
I guess we got that impression from the Doug Sellman who’s constantly in the media telling us the govt isn’t taking strong enough action against alcohol consumption, and that it should be tightening up various restrictions on the purchase and consumption of same. You should do something about that guy, he’s using your name and clearly giving us totally the wrong idea.
Comment by Psycho Milt — August 24, 2010 @ 10:14 pm