Daniel Ellsberg makes an interesting point in an Economist interview:
I would’ve thought that the National Security Agency could penetrate them and keep them from giving anonymity to leakers. We pay an awful lot to the NSA to spy on us—since 9/11—and on other people, and I supposed they were up to the task of denying secure communications to Wikileaks. But the administration’s surprise at these revelations indicates that Julian Assange is delivering to sources what he said he could—anonymity. And the reason that one person has been brought up on charges, Bradley Manning, is not due to any fault in the Wikileaks technology, but to Bradley Manning’s own choice to reveal himself to someone who in turn informed on him. So I hope that his being under charges won’t discourage other people from using the Wikileaks technology. I understand that Assange has offered, or plans to offer, this same technology or software to newspapers so that they can do Wikileaks’s job on a larger scale. And I hope they take advantage of that.
When you set up a government department with no oversight, no accountability and no objective outcomes to measure it by you get (a) the least competent organisation imaginable and (b) an intelligence agency.